Pretentious opinion piece about film

We all have films of which we hold in high regard and that’s great, we should always, except if you’re a parent, have our favourites because having a favourite means that there’s something special and extraordinary about whatever it is that you cherish so dearly.

I’ve also concluded – yeah I’ve thought about this in depth shoot me, I’m pathetic right? Wrong, film is important – that the following films are stand out because their narratives are engaging and authentic. Think about it, it’s clear that if a film is anything but engaging and authentic, it will be disengaging and predictable and such qualities don’t make for a classic. Take a sequel and then apply my theory. See, I told you. Ok so there are a few exceptions, namely Shrek 2 and Spiderman 2. But it is fair to say that the films that will leave you lost for words will be those that follow the archetype I’ve just rambled on about.

Below you will find a list of my five favourite films and, although they all share the same common denominator (explained above), they also uphold very unique qualities of which add to why I and so many others are so infatuated with them.

At number five we have Ryan Gosling’s directorial debut ‘Lost River’ that was upon release disliked by many with one critic describing it as “dumbfoundingly poor”. Bullshit, I say. The film is gaudy and distasteful in places, yes but cut Gosling some slack because overall the film is utterly distinctive. Utterly distinctive because unlike Refn and Lynch, Gosling successfully delivers a touching narrative that is able to weave in and out of the film’s fantastical appearance with ease. And that’s just what makes Lost River so fantastic, its perfectly delivered narrative. Set in dystopian Detroit, we meet Billy, a single mother who attempts to retain her family home whilst her eldest son discovers a hinted at, underwater metropolis. With faultless cameos from Eva Mendes, Matt Smith and the gorgeous Ben Mendelsohn, striking cinemaography and an eerie soundtrack to complement the film’s warped themes, ‘Lost River’ has it all.

Iain De Caestecker as Bones in Lost River, 2014.

At number four we have ‘Taxi Driver’, Martin Scorsese’s 1976 classic. Unlike ‘Lost River’, ‘Taxi Driver’ has always been regarded by many as one of cinema’s greatest. But why? Well, let me try and answer that for you. It could be a number of things but simply, I think it is Robert De Niro’s fault, his fault because he made protagonist Travis Barker so charismatic and unpredictable. He’s everything you want to be and more. He’s free, aloof and almost untouchable but there are moments in the film whereby you’re glad that you aren’t Travis Barker because where we’d walk on by, he stops. The characterisation that Scorsese and De Niro forge is your answer, the reason as to why ‘Taxi Driver’ is such an enthralling piece of cinema.

Robert De Niro as Travis Barker in Taxi Driver, 1976.

Third on my list is ‘Fish Tank‘, an independent movie from British director, Andrea Arnold. The film centres on protagonist Mia who is encouraged by her mother’s boyfriend, Connor, to follow her dreams of becoming a dancer. As Mia’s relationship with Connor develops into a sexual one, audiences lose hope in the reality of her dream. And although dark and pessimistic at times, the narrative is likeable because it is completely feasible. Audiences are able to draw parallels between Mia’s life and their own as it is the case for many that hurdles have also halted their dreams too. But Fish Tank boasts more. It serves as a social comment, it renders the message that with hard work, success is achievable. And it’s that message that makes the film so universal and so god damn important.

Katie Jarvis as Mia in Fish Tank, 2009.

Making its way to number two is of course Billy Wilder’s ‘Some Like It Hot’ which has been described by The Guardian’s John Patterson as ‘A perfect American comedy’. And he’s so right. At the expense of Curtis and Lemmon, Wilder delivers a laugh a minute. And still continues to do so because the film is fucking timeless. Unlike Frankie Boyle, who I know your Grandma despises, Some Like it Hot will have your Grandma in stitches and possibly even intensive care. Trust me, it’s that funny. Wilder took risks, he put two of America’s most treasured actors in heels – it could have ruined careers but it didn’t because Curtis and Lemmon give tasteful performances. From slapstick to double entendre, hyperbole to satire, the film flows in an unforeseeable direction and I just can’t get enough of it.

Tony Curtis as Joe and Jack Lemmon as Jerry in Some Like It Hot, 1959.

Stealing first place is one of Quentin Tarantino’s most underrated movies, ‘Death Proof’ and for those of you who know me well, that will come as no surprise. As a huge fan of road movies such as ‘The Cannonball Run’ and ‘Duel’ AND acting extraordinaire Kurt Russell, Death Proof and I are a match made in heaven. ‘Death Proof’ is daring, it’s an adrenaline rush. In just under two hours, Tarantino revises a genre and revives a career (sorry Kurt). And for me, that’s remarkable. But what’s even more remarkable is that he places women in front of the steering wheel – and no, we didn’t crash the car. Tarantino deserves all the Blue Peter badges because he gets it. He knows that women can fight their own battles and that Kurt Russell is still relevant. Long live QT.

Kurt Russell as Stuntman Mike in Death Proof, 2007.

So there you have it, my five fave flicks – of which are subject to change because I lack the ability to make concrete decisions, RT if; you cried or wanna make me rich and famous.

Lottie, out.

‘Big Bang Data’ – “dumbfounding but not headache inducing”

London’s new exhibition delves into datafication – yeah I’d never heard of the term either.


Data’s reshaping our world if you didn’t already know. But for the better? Well, Somerset House’s ‘Big Bang Data’ is exploring that exact question. For more money than most would like to part with you can grant yourself access to the work of the creatives that have taken data under their wing and wrestled with it in more ways than one. On display is an enlightening array of work that as a whole appears to present the profound idea that society is data-riddled. From updating our statuses and specifying what it is that we’re listening to or swiping right to a real catch 5km away – we’re besotted with the technology that is directly responsible for generating the large amounts of data we have gathered.

It is said that we live in an age of datafication an age regarded by many as being dangerous. Work such as Owen Mundy’s ‘I Know Where Your Cat Lives’, which focuses on data collation, highlights how easily we, without considerable thought, will share not only pictures of our adorable little kitties but alarmingly, our location. Although rather humorous, Mundy’s work is almost too frightening to enjoy.

As well as exploring data collation, the exhibition also explores data presentation which is not as unnerving but in fact a lot more comical – as much of the data used fails to affect the masses. Ellie Harrison’s ‘Vending Machine’ is a great example of how humour is being injected into what could potentially be a rather dark age for society. Harrison has programmed a vending machine to release a packet of crisps every time the BBC’s news channel uses a word they are renowned for spouting. I’m not going to tell porkies, other than the BBC’s obvious repetition of certain language I didn’t really know what sort of point Harrison was trying to convey, it seemed a little absurd if I’m to be totally honest – the data that was being collected was merely eye-opening for me but for some it may have offered a small insight into a very niche issue.

To forge art, many others had incorporated unimportant and irrelevant data into their work too and I couldn’t help but come to the conclusion that these artists were attempting to unearth a new movement, a movement that appeared to merge simplistic aesthetics with insignificant data. For example, Stefanie Posarec and Giorgia Lupi’s ‘Dear Data’ takes skill-less lines and a minimalistic key to present data in an inventive way. I very much enjoyed having to refer to the key in order to fully comprehend the work. Never have I been so active when observing a piece of work. Of course one is normally very active when interpreting art but sadly I am very lazy and if I’m given direction in the way of a key, I’ll utilise it.

Another piece that appeared to be a part of the same movement was Jaime Serra’s ‘Vida sexual d’una parella estable’ (A stable sex life). The piece documents Serra and his wife’s sex life over the period of a year using, just like Posarec and Lupi, simple lines and a very basic key. For such a technically simplistic piece of art, I found the piece to be very revealing in that patterns emerged.

I hate to sound as if I’m plugging but the pieces of work on display are certainly not to be missed if you want to enlighten yourself. I will admit that in parts, the exhibition was difficult to comprehend as I like many, found it hard to envisage the vast amount of intangible data we have produced. But believe me when I say that, ‘Big Bang Data’ is dumbfounding and not headache inducing.

After viewing the exhibition, I was left both inspired and disheartened. Inspired because of the shear inventiveness of the majority of the work yet disheartened because of how easy data is to acquire and manipulate. Fraud and impersonation are issues I don’t want to have to deal with but they were the problems that came to mind as I made my way through the exhibition. Artists highlighted how readily available data was to access and that is what frightens me the most.

Don’t worry about me though, I wont lose sleep over my new anxiety. Society is online and will almost probably never log off. With modernity comes flaws so here is to more data.